Marxist Feminism Essay Titles

Marxist feminism is feminism focused on investigating and explaining the ways in which women are oppressed through systems of capitalism and private property.[1] According to Marxist feminists, women's liberation can only be achieved through a radical restructuring of the current capitalist economy, in which, they contend, much of women's labor is uncompensated.[2]

Theoretical background in Marxism[edit]

Influential work by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels (1848) in The Communist Manifesto[3] and Marx (1859) in A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy laid the foundation for some of the early discourse about the relationship between capitalism and oppression. The theory and method of study developed by Marx (1859), termed historical materialism, recognizes the ways in which economic systems structure society as a whole and influence everyday life and experience.[4] Historical materialism places a heavy emphasis on the role of economic and technological factors in determining the base structure of society. The base structure prescribes a range of systems and institutions aimed to advance the interests of those in power, often at the cost of exploiting the working class. Marx (1859) argues that these systems are set by the ruling class in accordance with their need to maintain or increase class conflict in order to remain in power. However, Marx (1859) also acknowledges the potential for organization and collective action by the lower classes with the goal of empowering a new ruling class. As Vladimir Lenin (1917) argues in support of this possibility, the organization of socialist consciousness by a vanguard party is vital to the working class revolutionary process.[5]

In 1884, Engels published The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State[6] According to Engels (1884), the shift from feudalism to private ownership of land has had a huge effect on the status of women. In a private ownership system, individuals who do not own land or other means of production are in a situation that Engels (1884) compares to enslavement - they must work for the owners of the land in order to be able to live within the system of private ownership. Engels (1884) explains that the transition to this type of system resulted in the creation of separate public and private spheres and assigned access to waged labor disproportionately to men.

Engels (1884) argues that a woman's subordination is not a result of her biological disposition but of social relations, and that men's efforts to achieve their demands for control of women's labor and sexual faculties have gradually become institutionalized in the nuclear family. Through a Marxist historical perspective, Engels (1884) analyzes the widespread social phenomena associated with female sexual morality, such as fixation on virginity and sexual purity, incrimination and violent punishment of women who commit adultery, and demands that women be submissive to their husbands. Ultimately, Engels traces these phenomena to the recent development of exclusive control of private property by the patriarchs of the rising slaveowner class in the ancient mode of production, and the attendant desire to ensure that their inheritance is passed only to their own offspring: chastity and fidelity are rewarded, says Engels (1884), because they guarantee exclusive access to the sexual and reproductive faculty of women possessed by men from the property-owning class.

As such, gender oppression is closely related to class oppression and the relationship between men and women in society is similar to the relations between proletariat and bourgeoisie.[2] On this account women's subordination is a function of class oppression, maintained (like racism) because it serves the interests of capital and the ruling class; it divides men against women, privileges working class men relatively within the capitalist system in order to secure their support; and legitimates the capitalist class's refusal to pay for the domestic labor assigned, unpaid, to women.

Productive and reproductive labour[edit]

In the capitalist system, two types of labor exist, a division stressed by Marxist feminists like Margaret Benston and Peggy Morton.[7] The first is productive, in which the labor results in goods or services that have monetary value in the capitalist system and are thus compensated by the producers in the form of a paid wage. The second form of labor is reproductive, which is associated with the private sphere and involves anything that people have to do for themselves that is not for the purposes of receiving a wage (i.e. cleaning, cooking, having children). Both forms of labor are necessary, but people have different access to these forms of labor based on certain aspects of their identity. Women are assigned to the domestic sphere where the labor is reproductive and thus uncompensated and unrecognized in a capitalist system. It is in the best interest of both public and private institutions to exploit the labor of women as an inexpensive method of supporting a work force. For the producers, this means higher profits. For the nuclear family, the power dynamic dictates that domestic work is exclusively to be completed by the woman of the household thus liberating the rest of the members from their own necessary reproductive labor. Marxist feminists argue that the exclusion of women from productive labor leads to male control in both private and public domains.[7][8]

Accomplishments and activism[edit]

The militant nature of Marxist feminists and their ability to mobilize to promote social change has enabled them to engage in important activism. Though their controversial advocacy often receives criticism, Marxist feminists challenge capitalism in ways that facilitate new discourse and shed light on the status of women.[8] These women throughout history have used a range of approaches in fighting hegemonic capitalism, which reflect their different views on the optimal method of achieving liberation for women.[2]

Wages for housework[edit]

Focusing on exclusion from productive labor as the most important source of female oppression, some Marxist feminists devoted their activism to fighting for the inclusion of domestic work within the waged capitalist economy. The idea of creating compensated reproductive labor was present in the writings of socialists such as Charlotte Perkins Gilman (1898) who argued that women's oppression stemmed from being forced into the private sphere.[9] Gilman proposed that conditions for women would improve when their work was located, recognized, and valued in the public sphere.[2]

Perhaps the most influential of the efforts to compensate reproductive labor was the International Wages for Housework Campaign, an organization launched in Italy in 1972 by members of the International Feminist Collective. Many of these women, including Selma James,[10] Mariarosa Dalla Costa,[11] Brigitte Galtier, and Silvia Federici[12] published a range of sources to promote their message in academic and public domains. Despite the efforts beginning with a relatively small group of women in Italy, The Wages for Housework Campaign was successful in mobilizing on an international level. A Wages for Housework group was founded in Brooklyn, New York with the help of Federici.[12] As Heidi Hartmann acknowledges (1981), the efforts of these movements, though ultimately unsuccessful, generated important discourse regarding the value of housework and its relation to the economy.[8]

Sharing the responsibility of reproductive labour[edit]

Another solution proposed by Marxist feminists is to liberate women from their forced connection to reproductive labour. In her critique of traditional Marxist feminist movements such as the Wages for Housework Campaign, Heidi Hartmann (1981) argues that these efforts "take as their question the relationship of women to the economic system, rather than that of women to men, apparently assuming the latter will be explained in their discussion of the former."[8] Hartmann (1981) believes that traditional discourse has ignored the importance of women's oppression as women, and instead focused on women's oppression as members of the capitalist system. Similarly, Gayle Rubin, who has written on a range of subjects including sadomasochism, prostitution, pornography, and lesbian literature as well as anthropological studies and histories of sexual subcultures, first rose to prominence through her 1975 essay The Traffic in Women: Notes on the 'Political Economy' of Sex,[13] in which she coins the phrase "sex/gender system" and criticizes Marxism for what she claims is its incomplete analysis of sexism under capitalism, without dismissing or dismantling Marxist fundamentals in the process.

More recently, many Marxist feminists have shifted their focus to the ways in which women are now potentially in worse conditions after gaining access to productive labour. Nancy Folbre proposes that feminist movements begin to focus on women's subordinate status to men both in the reproductive (private) sphere, as well as in the workplace (public sphere).[14] In an interview in 2013, Silvia Federici urges feminist movements to consider the fact that many women are now forced into productive and reproductive labour, resulting in a "double day".[15] Federici argues that the emancipation of women still cannot occur until they are free from their burdens of unwaged labour, which she proposes will involve institutional changes such as closing the wage gap and implementing child care programs in the workplace.[15] Federici's suggestions are echoed in a similar interview with Selma James (2012) and these issues have been touched on in recent presidential elections.[10]

Intersectionality and Marxist feminism[edit]

With the emergence of Intersectionality as a widely popular theory of current feminism, Marxist feminists are broadening their focus to include persons that would be at an increased risk for exploitation in a capitalist system while also remaining critical of intersectionality theory for relying on bourgeois identity politics.[16] The current organization Radical Women provides a clear example of successful incorporation of the goals of Marxist feminism without overlooking identities that are more susceptible to exploitation. They contend that elimination of the capitalist profit-driven economy will remove the motivation for sexism, racism, homophobia, and other forms of oppression.[17]

Marxist-feminist critiques of other branches of Feminism[edit]

Clara Zetkin[18][19] and Alexandra Kollontai[20][21] are opposed to forms of feminism that reinforce class status. They do not see a true possibility to unite across economic inequality because they argue that it would be extremely difficult for an upper class woman to truly understand the struggles of the working class.

"For what reason... should the woman worker seek a union with the bourgeois feminists? Who, in actual fact, would stand to gain in the event of such an alliance? Certainly not the woman worker." - Alexandra Kollontai, 1909[20]

Critics like Kollontai (1909) believed liberal feminism would undermine the efforts of Marxism to improve conditions for the working class. Marxists supported the more radical political program of liberating women through socialist revolution, with a special emphasis on work among women and in materially changing their conditions after the revolution. Additional liberation methods supported by Marxist Feminists include radical demands coined as "Utopian Demands" by Maria Mies.[22] This indication of the scope of revolution required to promote change states that demanding anything less than complete reform will produce inadequate solutions to long-term issues.

Notable Marxist feminists[edit]

See also[edit]


  1. ^Desai, Murli (2014), "Feminism and policy approaches for gender aware development", in Desai, Murli, ed. (2014). The paradigm of international social development: ideologies, development systems and policy approaches. New York: Routledge. p. 119. ISBN 9781135010256. 
    • Poonacha, Veena (1995). Gender within the human rights discourse. RCWS Gender Series. Bombay: Research Centre for Women's Studies. S.N.D.T. Women's University. OCLC 474755917. 
  2. ^ abcdFerguson, Ann; Hennessy, Rosemary (2010), "Feminist perspectives on class and work", in Stanford Uni (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 
  3. ^Marx, Karl; Engels, Frederick (1848). The Communist Manifesto. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House. OCLC 919388374. View online.
  4. ^Marx, Karl (1904) [1859]. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Chicago: Charles H. Kerr & Co. OCLC 896669199. View online.
  5. ^Lenin, Vladimir (1917). The State and Revolution: The Marxist Theory of the State & The Tasks of the Proletariat in the Revolution. London: George Allen & Unwin. OCLC 926871435. View online.
  6. ^Engels, Frederick (1902) [1884]. The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State. Chicago: Charles H. Kerr & Co. OCLC 213734607. View online.
  7. ^ abVogel, Lise (2013), "A decade of debate", in Vogel, Lise (ed.). Marxism and the oppression of women: toward a unitary theory. Leiden, Holland: Brill. p. 17. ISBN 9789004248953. 
  8. ^ abcdHartmann, Heidi (1981), "The unhappy marriage of Marxism and feminism: towards a more progressive union", in Sargent, Lydia, Women and revolution: a discussion of the unhappy marriage of Marxism and Feminism, South End Press Political Controversies Series, Boston, Massachusetts: South End Press, pp. 1–42, ISBN 9780896080621. 
    • Reproduced as: Hartmann, Heidi (2013), "The unhappy marriage of Marxism and feminism: towards a more progressive union", in McCann, Carole; Kim, Seung-kyung, Feminist theory reader: local and global perspectives, New York: Routledge, pp. 187–199, ISBN 9780415521024 
  9. ^Gilman, C. P. (1898). Women and economics: a study of the economic relation between men and women as a factor in social evolution. Boston: Small, Maynard, & Co. OCLC 26987247. 
  10. ^ abGardiner, Becky (8 June 2012). "A life in writing: Selma James". The Guardian. 
  11. ^Dalla Costa, Mariarosa; James, Selma (1972). The power of women and the subversion of the community. Bristol, England: Falling Water Press. OCLC 67881986.

All Titles

  • A
    • May 27, 2016 Across Boundaries
    • May 27, 2016 Allegra Maud Goldman
    • May 27, 2016 Almost Touching the Skies
    • May 27, 2016 Always a Sister
    • May 27, 2016 Always From Somewhere Else
    • May 27, 2016 Among the White Moon Faces
    • May 27, 2016 The Amputated Memory
    • May 27, 2016 And the Bridge Is Love
    • May 27, 2016 And the World Changed
    • May 27, 2016 And They Didn't Die
    • May 27, 2016 Anna Teller
    • May 27, 2016 The Answer/La Respuesta
    • May 27, 2016 Antoinette Brown Blackwell
    • May 27, 2016 Apocalypse Baby
    • May 27, 2016 Apples from the Desert
    • May 27, 2016 Arguing With the Storm
    • May 27, 2016 Aung San Suu Kyi
    • May 27, 2016 Avie's Dreams
    • Dec 8, 2016 And the Spirit Moved Them
    • Dec 8, 2016 August
    • Nov 2, 2017 Against Memoir
  • B
    • Apr 1, 2005 Baghdad Burning
    • Sep 1, 2006 Baghdad Burning II
    • Aug 4, 2014 Babygate
    • Apr 6, 2016 Beijing Comrades
    • May 10, 2016 Black Dove
    • May 27, 2016 Bamboo Shoots After the Rain
    • May 27, 2016 Base Ten
    • May 27, 2016 Bearing Life
    • May 27, 2016 Bedelia
    • May 27, 2016 Behind Closed Doors
    • May 27, 2016 Between Mothers and Daughters
    • May 27, 2016 The Binding Vine
    • May 27, 2016 Black and White Sat Down Together
    • May 27, 2016 Black Foremothers
    • May 27, 2016 Black Wave
    • May 27, 2016 Born in the Big Rains
    • May 27, 2016 A Brighter Coming Day
    • May 27, 2016 Brown Girl, Brownstones
    • May 27, 2016 Bunny Lake Is Missing
    • May 27, 2016 But Some of Us Are Brave
    • May 31, 2016 By Cecile
    • May 31, 2016 Bye Bye Blondie
  • C
    • May 27, 2016 Call Home the Heart
    • May 27, 2016 Carrie Chapman Catt
    • May 27, 2016 The Captive Imagination
    • May 27, 2016 Cassandra
    • May 31, 2016 Celebrate People's History
    • May 31, 2016 The Changelings
    • May 31, 2016 Changes
    • May 31, 2016 Changing Lives
    • May 31, 2016 Chasing the King of Hearts
    • May 31, 2016 Children of the New World
    • May 31, 2016 The Chinese Garden
    • May 31, 2016 The Circle of Empowerment
    • May 31, 2016 A Clear Spring
    • May 31, 2016 Come Out the Wilderness
    • May 31, 2016 Coming to Birth
    • May 31, 2016 Complaints & Disorders (Second Edition)
    • Jun 1, 2016 Confessions of Madame Psyche
    • Jun 1, 2016 The Cosmopolitans
    • Jun 1, 2016 Cress Delahanty
    • Jun 1, 2016 The Crooked Line
    • Jun 1, 2016 A Cross and a Star
    • Jun 1, 2016 The Crunk Feminist Collection
  • D
    • Apr 14, 2015 Divorce Is the Worst
    • Apr 12, 2016 Death Is Stupid
    • May 31, 2016 Daddy Was a Number Runner
    • May 31, 2016 The Dance of the Demons
    • May 31, 2016 Daughter of Earth
    • May 31, 2016 Daughter of the Hills
    • May 31, 2016 The Daughters of Danaus
    • May 31, 2016 A Day at a Time
    • May 31, 2016 The Day Nina Simone Stopped Singing
    • May 31, 2016 Dearest Anne
    • May 31, 2016 The Defiant Muse: Dutch and Flemish Feminist Poems
    • May 31, 2016 The Defiant Muse: French Feminist Poems
    • May 31, 2016 The Defiant Muse: German Feminist Poems
    • May 31, 2016 The Defiant Muse: Hebrew Feminist Poems
    • May 31, 2016 The Defiant Muse: Hispanic Feminist Poems
    • May 31, 2016 The Defiant Muse: Italian Feminist Poems
    • May 31, 2016 The Defiant Muse: Vietnamese Feminist Poems
    • May 31, 2016 Departing at Dawn
    • May 31, 2016 Developing Power
    • May 31, 2016 Doctor Zay
    • Jun 1, 2016 The Doulas
    • Jun 1, 2016 The Dragon and the Doctor
    • Jun 1, 2016 Dream Homes
    • Jun 1, 2016 Dreaming of Baghdad
    • Jun 22, 2016 David's Story
  • E
  • F
    • Jun 1, 2016 Familias
    • Jun 1, 2016 Families
    • Jun 1, 2016 Families As We Are
    • Jun 1, 2016 Families in Flux
    • Jun 1, 2016 Fault Lines
    • Jun 1, 2016 The Feminist Porn Book
    • Jun 1, 2016 The Feminist Utopia Project
    • Jun 1, 2016 Fettered for Life
    • Jun 1, 2016 Follow Me into the Dark
    • Jun 1, 2016 Folly
    • Jun 1, 2016 From Eve To Dawn, A History of Women in the World, Volume I
    • Jun 1, 2016 From Eve to Dawn, A History of Women in the World, Volume II
    • Jun 1, 2016 From Eve to Dawn, A History of Women in the World, Volume III
    • Jun 1, 2016 From Eve to Dawn, A History of Women in the World, Volume IV
    • Jun 1, 2016 From Wonso Pond
  • G
  • H
    • Jun 1, 2016 HAMMER!
    • Jun 2, 2016 Harem Years
    • Jun 2, 2016 Here and Somewhere Else
    • Jun 2, 2016 Hey, Shorty!
    • Jun 2, 2016 Hiroshima in the Morning
    • Jun 2, 2016 His Own Where
    • Jun 2, 2016 Hold on to the Sun
    • Jun 3, 2016 Holding Up Half the Sky
    • Jun 3, 2016 The House of Memory
    • Jun 3, 2016 How I Wrote Jubilee
    • Apr 10, 2017 The Hunter Maiden
    • Apr 10, 2017 How Mamas Love Their Babies
  • I
    • Jun 3, 2016 I Dwell in Possibility
    • Jun 3, 2016 I Love Myself When I Am Laughing
    • Jun 3, 2016 I Still Believe Anita Hill
    • Jun 3, 2016 Icon
    • Jun 3, 2016 If a Tree Falls
    • Jun 3, 2016 In Her Own Image
    • Jun 3, 2016 In the Name of Friendship
    • Jun 3, 2016 Intimate Wars
    • Jun 3, 2016 Into the Go-Slow
    • Jun 3, 2016 Inventing the Real
    • Jun 3, 2016 Islanders
    • Apr 10, 2017 The Iliac Crest
  • J
  • K
  • L
    • Jun 3, 2016 Las Mujeres
    • Jun 3, 2016 Laura
    • Jun 3, 2016 Leaving Home
    • Jun 3, 2016 A Life in Motion
    • Jun 3, 2016 Life in the Iron Mills and Other Stories
    • Jun 3, 2016 Life Prints
    • Jun 3, 2016 A Lifetime of Labor
    • Jun 3, 2016 The Lilith Summer
    • Jun 3, 2016 Lillian D. Wald
    • Jun 3, 2016 Lion Woman's Legacy
    • Jun 3, 2016 The Little Locksmith
    • Jun 3, 2016 The Living Is Easy
    • Jun 3, 2016 Lone Voyagers
    • Jun 3, 2016 Long Walks and Intimate Talks
    • Jun 3, 2016 The Love Children
    • Jun 3, 2016 The Loved Ones
    • Jun 6, 2016 Lucretia Mott
    • Nov 1, 2017 La Bastarda
  • M

One thought on “Marxist Feminism Essay Titles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *